Report

Summary scores

Accessibility6.6

How accessible the website is to mobile and disabled users.

The following tests contribute to this score:

Experience2.8

How satisfying the website is likely to be for users.

Marketing1.7

How well marketed, and popular the website is.

Technology5.6

How well designed and built the website is.

Key points

  • This website does not appear optimised for printing See more
  • Relatively, very few other pages link to this site, making it extremely hard to find See more
  • Some pages have no defined headings, compromising SEO See more
  • The website is not fully W3C compliant See more

Facebook sharing0.0

The pages of this website have
0Facebook logo likes

The pages of this website have been shared on Facebook
0 times

  • None of the tested pages have been shared on Facebook.
    • Encourage users of your website share interesting pages with others by using like boxes.

Facebook page0.0

Facebook logo

This website does not appear to be associated with a Facebook page.

  • This website was found to contain some links to Facebook, but none appear to be public Facebook pages associated with this website.
    • Sign up for a Facebook page and make sure it is linked to from your site, or if you already have one make sure it is is public.

Printability0.0

0% of pages are optimised for printing

  • None of this website appears to be optimised for printing (using CSS).
    • Add printable stylesheets for all pages, wherever possible. In most cases, websites can share printable stylesheets over many or all pages, as with screen-based stylesheets.

Popularity0.0

  • This website has not yet been ranked by Alexa.
    • If this website is new, this is probably normal. Drive traffic to the website to get an Alexa ranking.

Twitter sharing0.0

Twitter Logo

0 Tweets reference this website

  • No tweets about this website were found on Twitter.
    • The number of tweets a website should have mentioning it depend very much on the type of website, its target audience, and how long it has been in operation. If you want to improve the number of tweets about your website, sign up yourself and engage with other Twitter users. Encourage sharing of your content with social media buttons on articles and pages of your website.

Headings3.1

80% of pages have defined headings

  • A significant amount (20.0%) of pages do not use defined headings. This means that users and search engines may find it harder to determine the content of this website's pages. Correctly defined headings aid accessibility and are particularly important for search engine optimisation.
    • Define meaningful headings for all webpages. This is likely to help this website's search engine placement and assist visitors in navigating content.
  • Many headings (18.0%) were found to be empty, or incorrectly defined. Empty or invalid headings are of no value to search engines and make a website less accessible.
    • Make sure all headings have content which is relevant to the page of content.
  • Some pages did not define headings correctly. The H1 tag should be used for the most top-level heading, with H2 being used for sub-headings and H3 for further sub-headings and so-on. Not conforming to this convention may confuse visitors.
    • Ensure that headings are defined in a semantically correct way, i.e. always start with a H1 tag. This is used to summarise the page content. Further tags (H2, H3, H4 etc) are meant to summarise and partition sections within the content.

Feeds5.3

RSS Logo

Some feeds are invalid

This website's feed is updated 3 times every year

  • 4 feeds were found on the 5 pages tested. This is good as it allows search engines and visitors to follow updates to this website.
  • 3 of the 4 feeds tested were found to be invalid. This is bad as some visitors may not be able to use the invalid feeds.
    • Ensure your feed generator produces valid feeds.
  • We couldn't determine the date of some of the items in your feed.
    • Ensure your feeds contain valid date elements.
  • Your syndicated content is updated about 3 times every year.

Feeds on this website

Feed URLTypeValidItemsLast UpdateFound on
www.activedir.de/websites/.../RSSNo0-http://www.activedir.de/websites/
www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/.../RSSNo0-http://www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/
www.activedir.de/comments/.../RSSNo0-http://www.activedir.de/, http://www.activedir.de/about/, http://www.activedir.de/silvester-2011/, http://www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/, http://www.activedir.de/websites/
www.activedir.de/feed/RSSYes101/01/12http://www.activedir.de/, http://www.activedir.de/about/, http://www.activedir.de/silvester-2011/, http://www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/, http://www.activedir.de/websites/

Feed validation errors

Feed URLErrorLineColumn
www.activedir.de/websites/.../lastBuildDate must be an RFC-822 date-time1216
www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/.../lastBuildDate must be an RFC-822 date-time1216
www.activedir.de/comments/.../Server returned HTTP Error 404: Not Found

Code quality7.0

22 errors

15 warnings

All pages use Semantic HTML

  • A total of 22 errors and 15 warnings were found on the 5 pages tested.
  • The majority (60.0%) of pages are not W3C compliant. Because there are errors in the code, some web browsers may not be able to read this website correctly and it may not always display correctly.
  • This website was detected as being HTML5
  • All of the tested pages appear to use semantic HTML. This is excellent.
  • None of the tested pages of this site use tables for layout. This is excellent, as using tables for layout is not necessary and they should only contain tabular data. A well built website should use div elements and CSS to create the desired layout.

W3C Testing Results

URL format7.6

2 URLs are less than ideal

  • A large proportion (40.0%) of web addresses (URLs) are less than ideal.
  • 40.0% of URLs (2) are particularly hard to type or remember.
    • URLs using unusual characters (such as semi-colons or underscores), long numerals or complex phrasing are very difficult for real people to use or exchange. They also tend to be less favoured by search engines. Wherever possible ensure web addresses are 'human readable' - i.e. they should be easy to read, remember and type. In particular, avoid the use of obscure characters (including the underscore, which is not widely understood by non-technical users, or particularly memorable) and long numerals, e.g. example.com/23857984325. Consider URL rewriting as an effective and transparent means of creating appropriate URLs.

Duplicate content10.0

  • This website follows the best practice of using a permanent (HTTP 301) redirect between URLs with/without trailing slashes. This is ideal.
  • This website follows the best practice of using a permanent (HTTP 301) redirect from http://activedir.de to http://www.activedir.de. This is ideal.

Analytics10.0

100% of pages use analytics

Google Analytics v2

  • Every page in this website is using Google Analytics v2. This is excellent and should allow for a complete analysis of visitor behaviour.

Inoffensive content10.0

Very unlikely to be blocked by a content filtering system

  • None of the pages tested will be blocked by filtering systems.

Page titles10.0

100% of pages have defined titles

0% of page titles are weak

  • All pages were found to use page titles appropriately. Page titles appear in search results and at the top of the browser's window when visiting the site. Appropriate page titles are particularly important for search engine optimisation.

Meta tags10.0

This is how this website will look in Google search listings:

Urlaubsimpressionen

www.activedir.de/

ActiveDir ist der private Webauftritt von Robert Müller - social4hotel.de

  • Appropriate metadata is used throughout. All pages were found to include a meta description which search engines (like Google) show in search result pages.

Meta Tags (name attribute)

Page URLNameContent
www.activedir.de/generatorWordPress 3.3.2
www.activedir.de/descriptionActiveDir ist der private Webauftritt von Robert Müller - social4hotel.de
www.activedir.de/about/generatorWordPress 3.3.2
www.activedir.de/about/descriptionActiveDir ist der private Webauftritt von Robert Müller - social4hotel.de
www.activedir.de/silvester-2011/generatorWordPress 3.3.2
www.activedir.de/silvester-2011/descriptionActiveDir ist der private Webauftritt von Robert Müller - social4hotel.de
www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/generatorWordPress 3.3.2
www.activedir.de/la-palma-2011/descriptionActiveDir ist der private Webauftritt von Robert Müller - social4hotel.de
www.activedir.de/websites/generatorWordPress 3.3.2
www.activedir.de/websites/descriptionActiveDir ist der private Webauftritt von Robert Müller - social4hotel.de

Nibbler tested the following pages

Nibbler will test up to 5 pages of a website. You can test more with SiteBeam, our premium tool for testing websites.

Get more detail with SiteBeam

Nibbler's really designed for testing small personal websites but if you need a more professional tool, with export features and more detailed results, try SiteBeam - our website testing tool that helps web companies sell and build better websites.

Test drive SiteBeam now: With our free trial.

Here's how they compare:

Report limit5 webpages250 webpages
Report detailOne page reportComprehensive reports and presentations
Number of tests20 individual tests.40 individual tests including extras like Spelling, Search ranking, Broken links.
See the full list of tests
Export resultsNoYes
SupportNoYes
Store old reportsNoYes
Add your brandingNoYes
PriceFreeFrom £40/$60 per month Take a free trial