Report

Summary scores

Accessibility6.5

How accessible the website is to mobile and disabled users.

Experience4.9

How satisfying the website is likely to be for users.

Marketing1.0

How well marketed, and popular the website is.

Technology5.7

How well designed and built the website is.

Key points

  • This website does not appear to use any analytics software See more
  • Relatively, very few other pages link to this site, making it extremely hard to find See more
  • The website is not W3C compliant See more
  • A significant proportion of URLs are less than ideal See more

Analytics0.0

0% of pages use analytics

  • None of this website is using any recognised analytics software. It is still possible to gather a great deal of information from webserver logs, however complete visitor analysis requires client-side Javascript or an image not found here.
    • Consider a leading website analytics solution, such as WebTrends or Google Analytics.
  • Note that this test can only detect recognised analytics solutions. If an analytics solution is new, obscure or used in a non-standard way (e.g. it has been customised) it may not be detected.

Facebook sharing0.0

The pages of this website have
0Facebook logo likes

The pages of this website have been shared on Facebook
0 times

  • None of the tested pages have been shared on Facebook.
    • Encourage users of your website share interesting pages with others by using like boxes.

Facebook page0.0

Facebook logo

This website does not appear to be associated with a Facebook page.

  • This website was found to contain some links to Facebook, but none appear to be public Facebook pages associated with this website.
    • Sign up for a Facebook page and make sure it is linked to from your site, or if you already have one make sure it is is public.

Popularity0.0

  • This website has not yet been ranked by Alexa.
    • If this website is new, this is probably normal. Drive traffic to the website to get an Alexa ranking.

Twitter sharing0.0

Twitter Logo

0 Tweets reference this website

  • No tweets about this website were found on Twitter.
    • The number of tweets a website should have mentioning it depend very much on the type of website, its target audience, and how long it has been in operation. If you want to improve the number of tweets about your website, sign up yourself and engage with other Twitter users. Encourage sharing of your content with social media buttons on articles and pages of your website.

Meta tags2.0

Meta Tags (name attribute)

Page URLNameContent
www.social4food.de/viewportwidth=device-width
www.social4food.de/generatorWordPress 3.3.2
www.social4food.de/beispiel-seiteviewportwidth=device-width
www.social4food.de/beispiel-seitegeneratorWordPress 3.3.2
www.social4food.de/author/adminviewportwidth=device-width
www.social4food.de/author/admingeneratorWordPress 3.3.2
www.social4food.de/category/allgemeinviewportwidth=device-width
www.social4food.de/category/allgemeingeneratorWordPress 3.3.2
www.social4food.de/2011/10viewportwidth=device-width
www.social4food.de/2011/10generatorWordPress 3.3.2

Code quality3.9

13 errors

5 warnings

4 pages do not use Semantic HTML

  • A total of 13 errors and 5 warnings were found on the 5 pages tested.
  • No pages are W3C compliant. Because there are errors in the code, some web browsers may not be able to read this website correctly and it may not always display correctly.
  • This website was detected as being HTML5
  • 4 pages of this website were found to be using the tag <b>. It is widely regarded that use of presentational elements like <b> should be avoided.
  • None of the tested pages of this site use tables for layout. This is excellent, as using tables for layout is not necessary and they should only contain tabular data. A well built website should use div elements and CSS to create the desired layout.

W3C Testing Results

Images5.2

No images are being resized by the browser

All images have alt text

Feeds6.0

RSS Logo

All feeds are valid

This website's feed is updated 2 times every year

  • 5 feeds were found on the 5 pages tested. This is good as it allows search engines and visitors to follow updates to this website.
  • All of the 5 feeds tested were found to be valid. This is excellent.
  • We couldn't determine the date of some of the items in your feed.
    • Ensure your feeds contain valid date elements.
  • Your syndicated content is updated roughly twice every year.

Feeds on this website

Feed URLTypeValidItemsLast UpdateFound on
www.social4food.de/category/.../feedRSSYes119/10/11http://www.social4food.de/category/allgemein
www.social4food.de/author/.../feedRSSYes119/10/11http://www.social4food.de/author/admin
www.social4food.de/beispiel-seite/feedRSSYes0-http://www.social4food.de/beispiel-seite
www.social4food.de/comments/feedRSSYes119/10/11http://www.social4food.de/, http://www.social4food.de/beispiel-seite, http://www.social4food.de/author/admin, http://www.social4food.de/category/allgemein, http://www.social4food.de/2011/10
www.social4food.de/feedRSSYes119/10/11http://www.social4food.de/, http://www.social4food.de/beispiel-seite, http://www.social4food.de/author/admin, http://www.social4food.de/category/allgemein, http://www.social4food.de/2011/10

URL format8.8

1 URLs are less than ideal

  • A significant proportion (20.0%) of web addresses (URLs) are less than ideal.
  • One URL is particularly hard to type or remember.
    • URLs using unusual characters (such as semi-colons or underscores), long numerals or complex phrasing are very difficult for real people to use or exchange. They also tend to be less favoured by search engines. Wherever possible ensure web addresses are 'human readable' - i.e. they should be easy to read, remember and type. In particular, avoid the use of obscure characters (including the underscore, which is not widely understood by non-technical users, or particularly memorable) and long numerals, e.g. example.com/23857984325. Consider URL rewriting as an effective and transparent means of creating appropriate URLs.

      Page extensions

Duplicate content10.0

  • This website follows the best practice of using a permanent (HTTP 301) redirect between URLs with/without trailing slashes. This is ideal.
  • This website follows the best practice of using a permanent (HTTP 301) redirect from http://social4food.de to http://www.social4food.de. This is ideal.

Inoffensive content10.0

Very unlikely to be blocked by a content filtering system

  • None of the pages tested will be blocked by filtering systems.

Page titles10.0

100% of pages have defined titles

0% of page titles are weak

  • All pages were found to use page titles appropriately. Page titles appear in search results and at the top of the browser's window when visiting the site. Appropriate page titles are particularly important for search engine optimisation.

Headings10.0

100% of pages have defined headings

  • All pages were found to use defined headings. This is excellent as it allows visitors and search engines to summarise the content of webpages quickly. Correctly defined headings aid accessibility and are particularly important for search engine optimisation.

Page headings detail

Printability10.0

100% of pages are optimised for printing

  • All of this website appears to be optimised for printing (using CSS).

Nibbler tested the following pages

Nibbler will test up to 5 pages of a website. You can test more with SiteBeam, our premium tool for testing websites.

Get more detail with SiteBeam

Nibbler's really designed for testing small personal websites but if you need a more professional tool, with export features and more detailed results, try SiteBeam - our website testing tool that helps web companies sell and build better websites.

Test drive SiteBeam now: With our free trial.

Here's how they compare:

Report limit5 webpages250 webpages
Report detailOne page reportComprehensive reports and presentations
Number of tests20 individual tests.40 individual tests including extras like Spelling, Search ranking, Broken links.
See the full list of tests
Export resultsNoYes
SupportNoYes
Store old reportsNoYes
Add your brandingNoYes
PriceFreeFrom £40/$60 per month Take a free trial