Report for podvignaroda.ru

Overall3.8

The overall score for this website.

Accessibility4.0

How accessible the website is to mobile and disabled users.

The following tests contribute to this score:

Experience3.4

How satisfying the website is likely to be for users.

Marketing4.0

How well marketed and popular the website is.

Technology4.5

How well designed and built the website is.

Nibbler tested a sample of 5 pages from this website at 1:54 AM on Jan 14, 2022 (GMT).

This website uses JavaScript to load its content. We were able to analyse this website but some of the content we saw may be different to what users see in a browser.

Top priorities for website improvement

  • Make sure that all pages have a title in the head of the document. (read more)
  • Check how the website looks using a mobile and a tablet. Consider adding mobile-only styling using media queries. Some websites employ other techniques for mobile visitors which we cannot currently detect. (read more)
  • Define meaningful headings for all webpages. This is likely to help this website's search engine placement and assist visitors in navigating content. (read more)

Twitter0.0

This website does not appear to be associated with a Twitter account.

  • This website did not contain a link to Twitter.
    • Sign up for a Twitter account and make sure it is linked to from your site.

Headings0.0

  • No pages were found to be using defined headings. This means that users and search engines may find it harder to determine the content of this website's page. Correctly defined headings aid accessibility and are particularly important for search engine optimization.
    • Define meaningful headings for all webpages. This is likely to help this website's search engine placement and assist visitors in navigating content.

Printability0.0

0% of pages are optimized for printing

Amount of content0.0

Rendering Chart...

  • This website has an average of 4 words per page. The amount of content on a website has been shown to correlate with its search engine ranking.
    • Consider the amount of text on this website and increase it if appropriate.
  • 5 pages of this website have very little content (20 words or less).
    • Ensure all pages have a sufficient amount of content.

Meta tags0.8

Meta Tags (http-equiv attribute)

Page URLNameContent
podvignaroda.ru/podvig-flash/Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
podvignaroda.ru/podvig-flash/history.htmContent-Typetext/html; charset=iso-8859-1

Freshness0.9

Last updated April 27, 2018

  • It looks like this website was last updated on Friday, April 27, 2018. This is bad because visitors may dismiss this website as outdated. Websites that are not updated regularly are also spidered by search engines less often.
    • Consider updating this website regularly with new content.
  • To find this information we used the last modified dates reported by this website's server in addition to looking for dates written on each page.

All dates found

DateFileSource
4/27/18podvignaroda.ru/podvig-flash/Last modified header
4/27/18podvignaroda.ru/podvig-flash/history.htmLast modified header

Mobile1.8

Mobile screenshot of podvignaroda.ruTablet screenshot of podvignaroda.ru
  • None of this website appears to be optimized for viewing on a mobile or tablet (using CSS media queries). It is important to make sure your content is optimized for a wide range of devices as a growing percentage of web browsing is done on phones and tablets.
  • Some of this website is unlikely to work at all on a mobile or tablet since pages were found that use Adobe Flash without an alternative. Flash is commonly used to add interactivity or video to a website, but it can only be viewed on devices which have the Flash plugin. The Flash plugin is not available to many mobile phones and tablets so they cannot view Flash content. Additionally, web spiders like Google also have problems spidering Flash based content, so heavy use of Flash may not be good for SEO.
    • Consider rebuilding the website without Flash. At the very least you should provide an alternative version that can be viewed by all visitors.

Analytics2.0

20% of pages use analytics

Multiple Analytics Solutions

  • 20.0% of this website is using some form of analytics software but 4 pages have no analytics. It is still possible to gather a great deal of information for the other 4 of pages from webserver logs, however complete visitor analysis requires client-side Javascript or an image not found here.
    • Consider adding your analytics solution to the pages which aren't currently monitored.
  • Note that this test can only detect recognised analytics solutions. If an analytics solution is new, obscure or used in a non-standard way (e.g. it has been customised) it may not be detected.

Analytics Software Found

Software Name
Google Analytics

Page titles2.0

20% of pages have defined titles

0% of page titles are weak

  • 4 pages do not specify a title. Page titles appear in search results and at the top of the browser's window when visiting the site. Appropriate page titles are particularly important for search engine optimisation.

Server behavior5.2

Yes404 page

NoCompression

  • This website handles missing pages correctly by sending a 404 HTTP status code.
  • This website was not served using GZIP encoding. GZIP compression is widely supported and reduces the load time of a web page.
  • One page of this website follows the best practice of using a permanent (HTTP 301) redirect between its URL with/without a trailing slash. This page is ideal.
  • There is duplicate content on http://www.podvignaroda.ru and http://podvignaroda.ru. This is bad, as technically they are classed as two different websites. Search engines may lower a website's rank if they find the same content on two different URLs.
    • Choose one domain that you would like to use and then set a permanent (HTTP 301) redirect to forward users who visit the other.

URL format5.6

  • 2 URLs are particularly hard to type or remember.
    • Consider URL rewriting as an effective and transparent means of creating appropriate URLs. URLs using unusual characters (such as semi-colons or underscores), long numerals or complex phrasing are very difficult for real people to use or exchange. They also tend to be less favoured by search engines. Wherever possible ensure web addresses are 'human readable' - i.e. they should be easy to read, remember and type. In particular, avoid the use of obscure characters (including the underscore, which is not widely understood by non-technical users, or particularly memorable) and long numerals, e.g. example.com/23857984325.
  • 2 URLs are 'dirty'. 'Dirty' URLs include one or more parameters after a question mark (e.g. www.example.com/?pagename=news), instead of a clean URL (e.g. www.example.com/news). Dirty URLs should generally be avoided wherever possible - they are almost impossible for human beings to remember, may expose the technology of the website to hackers and can confuse search engines among other problems. Their use is sometimes necessary for specific applications, and acceptable in small amounts.
  • 1 URLs include a file extension.
    • Avoid use of file extensions wherever possible. File extensions appear at the end of web addresses, and have several negative effects. They make the address harder to remember or type (particularly for non-technical users), and can reveal the underlying technology of the website making it very slightly more vulnerable to hackers. They also tie the implementation of the website to a specific technology, which can make subsequent migration of URLs difficult. Consider URL rewriting as an effective and transparent means of creating appropriate URLs.

      Page extensions

Images6.0

50% of images have a clearly defined size

No images are being resized by the browser

  • Some images (50.0%) don't have defined sizes using width and height attributes in the HTML. These attributes are optional, but strongly recommended as they help the browser arrange the page more quickly.
  • 1 images on this website could not be downloaded. Broken images may cause the website to display incorrectly for visitors.

Popularity8.4

210,380 Most popular website in the world

This website recently saw a moderate increase in popularity.

  • This is the 210,380 most popular website in the world.
  • Over the past 3 months, this website has experienced a moderate increase in popularity.

Source: Alexa

Domain agei

  • Sorry, we cannot check the domain age of .ru websites.

Fast, branded website audits

Insites creates professional website reports that can be shared with your clients.

How does Insites compare?

Tests 17 fixed tests 50+ testsCovers SEO, SEM, Google My Business, reviews, social media and much more
Add your brandingNoYes
Export & shareNoPDF & link
Lead generationNoEmbed on your site
Competitor auditsNoYes
Test as a batchNoYes
Integrations + APINoYes
Multi-lingualNo20+ languages
Try it free

Nibbler tested the following pages

This website uses JavaScript to load its content. We were able to analyse this website but some of the content we saw may be different to what users see in a browser.